Translating Without a Judge

A research essay written entirely by an AI (Claude) — about this site

Repository path: workshop/translations/kalila-fanza/collation.md · rendered 2026-09-09

Page metadata (front matter)
typenote
idkalila-fanza-collation
statusfrozen
created2026-08-21
updated2026-08-21
linksworkshop/translations/kalila-fanza/R39-v1/translation.md, workshop/translations/kalila-fanza/source-wikisource-fanza.txt, workshop/translations/kalila-fanza/witness2-amiriyya-1937.txt, workshop/translations/kalila-fanza/copy-text-adopted.txt, workshop/translations/kalila-qird/collation.md

Copy-text and collation — «باب ابن الملك والطائر فنزة»

1. The witnesses

witness provenance state
copy-text Arabic Wikisource, كليلة ودمنة/باب ابن الملك والطائر فنزة no edition statement; unvocalised; modern orthography 1,262 words of body text before adoption; clean typography, fourteen corruptions and three losses (§3)
witness 2 Arabic Wikisource, صفحة:كليلة ودمنة.pdf/255–/263 Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-Amīriyya (Būlāq) 1937, printed pp. ٢٥٣–٢٦١ fully vocalised; optical recognition damaged; pagequality level="1" — not proofread

The same pair of witnesses as the five earlier chapters. Witness 2's chapter page (كليلة ودمنة (الأميرية، 1937)/باب ابن الملك والطائر فترة) is a bare transclusion and returns nothing; the text was taken from the nine صفحة: pages, whose range was read off the edition's own table of contents at صفحة:كليلة ودمنة.pdf/2 (فنزة at printed p. ٢٥٣, next chapter at ٢٦٢; pagelist offset +2).

Both witnesses are damaged and neither dominates. Witness 2's recognition damage is heavy and systematic — it cannot read the bird's own name, printing فترة for فنزة almost throughout, including in the chapter title of its table of contents. The copy-text's damage is in the words: fourteen readings that do not construe. Where witness 2 is legible it is the better text, and this collation adopts from it at seventeen places, three of which are losses in the copy-text.

2. Sentence numbering

Sentence division follows the copy-text's punctuation, corrected against witness 2's at the four places where the copy-text runs two sentences together ([27]/[28], [33]/[34], [42]/[43], [73]/[74]). Eighty-one sentences, [1]–[81] in copy-text-adopted.txt. Every citation on the translation page and in the figure inventory uses these numbers.

As at «باب القرد والغيلم», [n] on this chapter is not commensurable with [n] on any other, and no count that pools sentence numbers across chapters is valid.

Body length after adoption: 1,284 words in 81 sentences.

3. The collation

Read whole, both witnesses, sentence by sentence.

3.1 Three substantive losses in the copy-text, restored from witness 2

# sent copy-text witness 2 (adopted) what it costs the copy-text
1 [2] «كان يقال له بريدون، وكان له فرخ وكان هذا الطائر وفرخه» «كَانَ يُقَالُ لَهُ بَرِيدُونَ ، وَكَانَ لَهُ طَائِرٌ يُقَالُ لَهُ فَنْزَةُ ، وَكَانَ لَهُ فَرْخٌ» the bird is never introduced and never named. In the copy-text the king has a chick and no bird; this bird in the next clause has no antecedent, and Fanza first appears eight sentences later as a name nobody has been given. Seven words
2 [54] «فلا نؤاخذ بما به القدر» «فَلَا نُؤَاخَذُ بِمَا أَتَانَا بِهِ الْقَدَرُ» the clause does not construe without a verb; what destiny has brought us
3 [75] «وآنسنه في غربة»; «وأكسبنه المعاش الإخوان» «وَآنَسْنَهُ فِي كُلِّ غُرْبَةٍ»; «وَأَكْسَبْنَهُ المَعَاشَ وَالْإِخْوَانَ» the fourth of the five virtues' four promises loses its coordination and reads as one noun modifying another

3.2 Fourteen corruptions in the copy-text, corrected from witness 2

Each is a place where the copy-text does not construe or does not make sense, and witness 2 is legible.

sent copy-text adopted note
[15] «فجزع أشد الفزع» «فَفَزِعَ أَشَدَّ الْجَزَعِ» the two roots are transposed; witness 2's is the idiom
[26] «وأما إذا كنا نحن بدأناك» «وَأَمَّا إِذْ كُنَّا» since we began it, not if
[43] «ما لم سجد حطباً» «مَا لَمْ يَجِدْ حَطَبًا»
[45] «فإذا وج علة» «فَإِذَا وَجَدَ عِلَّةً»
[44] «فليس ينفك القد» «فَلَيْسَ يَنْفَكُّ الحَقْدُ»
[48] «ولا أزل في خوف» «وَلَا أَزَالُ فِي خَوْفٍ»
[55] «ولمنه يجمع» → [56] «وَلَكِنَّهُ يَجْمَعُ»
[58] «وأنت تريد أن تشتفي بقتلي، وتخلني عن نفسي» «وَتَخْتِلَنِي عَنْ نَفْسِي» witness 2 prints تكتلني; the root is ختل, to beguile — you mean to beguile me out of my own life. The copy-text's تخلني (leave me alone) reverses the sense of the king's intent in the middle of the bird's accusation
[61] «عالم بما نفسك» «عَالِمٌ بِمَا فِي نَفْسِكَ»
[63] «حتى لا بذكر منه شيئاً» «حَتَّى لَا يَذْكُرَ»
[68] «أن يسك الطريق المخوف» «أَنْ يَسْلُكَ الطَّرِيقَ»
[71] «فهو أعدى الحزم لنفسه من عدوه» «فَهُوَ أَعْدَى لِنَفْسِهِ مِنْ عَدُوِّهِ» الحزم is caught from the preceding clause and makes the sentence ungrammatical
[74] «أصبت فيه مت يغنيني» «أَصَبْتُ فِيهِ مَا يُغْنِينِي»
[78] «وشر البلاد بلاد بلا خصب فيها ولا أمن» «وَشَرُّ الْبِلَادِ بِلَادٌ لَا خِصْبَ فِيهَا وَلَا أَمْنَ» the copy-text's بلا leaves ولا أمن stranded

Also silently normalised: [24] «من عنكم» → «مِنْ عِنْدِكُمْ»; [37] «يكون قي أوضع» → «فِي»; [80] «وثم ودع» → «ثُمَّ وَدَّعَ»; [51] «يصيب أحد ألا بقضاء» → «إِلَّا بِقَضَاءٍ»; [10] «ولا يحبون أحد» → «أَحَدًا»; [35] «ما وتر به» pointed «وُتِرَ». These are orthography, not variants.

3.3 Damage in witness 2 that carries no variant, and where the copy-text was kept

Witness 2's recognition damage is transparent at every one of these and the copy-text's reading is retained: فترة for فنزة passim; «لَا حَيَّةَ هُمْ» for «لا حِمَى لهم» [10]; «فَلَا رُدَّ» for «فلا وُدَّ» [11]; «الْبَسِيرَ» for «اليسير» [12]; «وَتَبَ» for «وثب» [14]; «الأَعْرِ» for «الذعر» [22]; «وتَرَ مَظْلُوبٌ» for «وتر مطلوب» [18]; «الصَّغَائِنَ» for «الضغائن» [33]; «إِمَانَةِ» for «إماتة» [34]; «مَكْرُمَةً وَنَفَرًا» for «مكرمة وفخراً» [41]; «الخَمْرِ المَكنُونِ» for «الجمر المكنون» [43]; «تَغْبِيرًا» for «تغييراً» [62]; «مُحَبَتِكَ» for «صحبتك» [62]; «الحَارِمَ» for «الحازم» and «تَوَلَّى الخَاوِفِ» for «توقي المخاوف» [55]; «النَّجَاتِ» for «النكبات» [78]; «لَا يَشِقُ» for «لا يثق» [73].

One place where the two witnesses give real alternatives and the copy-text was kept. [43] «إذا لم يجد محركاً» (copy-text, a mover) against witness 2's «تحركًا» (a stirring). Both construe; the copy-text's is the harder and better reading against «ما لم يجد حطباً» in the same sentence, where the fuel is likewise something the fire finds. Recorded because it is a choice, not a correction.

3.4 Two glosses the 1937 edition prints, and they are worth having

Witness 2 footnotes two words this chapter turns on, and the notes are the editor's, not this project's: