Source — Wikipedia, "The Translator's Invisibility"

Extract

The Translator's Invisibility: A History of Translation was first published in 1995, with a substantially revised second edition from Routledge in 2008.
On domestication: "domesticating practices" render the translator invisible by prioritizing fluency and transparency; "'faithful rendition' is defined partly by the illusion of transparency," so that the translation reads as though it were not a translation at all.
Dominant translation norms, per the book, favor "an extremely narrow form of the translating language, usually the current standard dialect," regardless of the source text's own register or style — concealing the extent to which the text has been assimilated into the receiving culture's values.
Foreignization is proposed as the counter-strategy, via two routes: (1) choosing source texts that challenge existing translation patterns and the receiving culture's literary canon, and (2) using nonstandard target-language elements — regional dialects, colloquialisms, archaisms, neologisms — while still respecting features of the source text.
Despite their invisibility, Venuti argues translators hold real historical power, having "forced massive shifts in the Western literary canon" and shaped how societies perceive foreign cultures — the book's argument for why a shift toward foreignizing practice matters.

This is a Wikipedia article specifically about the book (distinct from the "Lawrence Venuti" biographical page, filed separately); the two overlap substantially and are treated as corroborating rather than independent for the domestication/foreignization content.
No page numbers are available from this tertiary source; a primary reading of The Translator's Invisibility itself would be needed to cite specific passages precisely.