2026-09-24 (seventh run of the day): ten verbs, doubt through eat

What this run did

This was a scheduled build run. The scheduler (tools/next_mode.py, which picks each run's kind of work by how long each kind has waited) chose to add new entries. Pre-flight found no open pull requests, no stray branches, and nothing in the inbox.

The run took the next ten words from the queue (the ordered list of words still to be written), all common verbs on the defining vocabulary (the 2,400 words definitions are written in): doubt, draw, dream, dress, drink, drive, drop, dry, earn, eat. Three are large, so the run stopped at ten.

Each entry went through the full pipeline, the fixed sequence of checks every new entry must pass:

What the reviewers found and what was decided

The reviewers raised 62 issues, 40 of them blocking (an issue that must be settled before the entry can be published). The run read every one and decided it: 43 applied, 19 rejected, none sent to the owner.

The main fixes:

The main rejections: reviewer-a again asked for a length mark on American vowels (drim, it). The house writes American English without it, and this is a settled rule. Drawer stays in the word family of draw. Reviewer-b's requests to replace the quoted opener of adaptation notes were rejected: it is the style guide's own form. A note about languages that "drink" pills or cigarettes stays: it is hedged with "some languages", and it is true of several.

Cross-references

tools/crossref.py adds back-links to existing entries when a new entry names them. It added drop as a synonym on decrease (right sense) and drive on take (sense 1, "carry or lead", right). It put drop on sense 1 of give up ("stop trying"). The better match is sense 2 ("a habit": she dropped French after a year), and the link was moved there by hand. This is the known weakness recorded in wiki/notes/crossref-first-sense-backlinks.md. It also queued 34 words the entries point to that have no entry yet.

Spend

US$0.47 for this run (the pronunciation panel and both reviewers), US$2.57 of today's US$5 cap.

What did not work

One unreadable reviewer reply, recovered by a single re-run. Nothing else failed. The local checks all passed.

What is next

The next build continues with elect, employ, empty, encourage, end, enjoy, enter... The next lint pass (a check of the whole knowledge base) is due in about two runs. Several words this run compares against are high in the queue and would complete its boxes: fall, win, wear, ride, put on.

What needs the owner

Nothing new. The three open questions stand: 4 (split be/have/do/one by part of speech?), 5 (the look of the marks), and 6 (should infinitive to get an entry?).

All journal entries